The necessity of smart contract testing is also evident in the fact that smart contracts are immutable. Once you deploy them, there is no way of returning back for an update after the launch. Therefore, rigorous testing before deploying smart contracts on Ethereum is a recommended practice for all blockchain-based projects. Let us learn more about testing best practices for smart contracts on Ethereum.
Definition of Smart Contract Testing
The first thing you need to understand answers for “How do you test a smart contract Ethereum?” is the definition of testing a smart contract. It refers to the process involving the comprehensive analysis and review of smart contracts for quality assessment of source code over the course of its development cycle. The testing process helps in the easier identification of vulnerabilities and bugs. As a result, smart testing contracts could ensure lesser possibilities of smart contract logic or software errors. Subsequently, developers can avoid the concerns of breaches which could lead to additional costs.
You can employ different tests for smart contracts depending on the desired benefits. The two primary categories of testing smart contracts on Ethereum include manual testing and automated testing. Here is an overview of both testing approaches.
Manual testing, as the name implies, requires human intervention for the manual execution of different steps. One of the most common examples of manual testing of smart contracts refers to code audits. Developers or auditors review every line of code in a code audit to identify discrepancies. The processes for manually testing Ethereum smart contracts would demand considerable levels of skills. At the same time, manual testing also invites the need to invest more effort, time and money. It is also important to note that manual testing also accompanies the possibility of human error.
On the other hand, manual testing methods can help in identifying defects in smart contract logic that could not be identified in automated testing approaches. Manual testing could also identify vulnerabilities for smart contracts beyond the code, such as in interactions with off-chain components.
The next answer to “How do you test a smart contract Ethereum?” would draw attention toward automated testing. Automated testing is the process of testing a smart contract with automated tools, which can create scripts for testing. The primary element in automated testing is automated software which could run multiple tests repeatedly to identify smart contract defects.
The significant advantages of automated tools for testing smart contracts include resource effectiveness and efficiency. Without the need for manual intervention, developers could focus on refining the core feature of the dApp. Most important of all, automated testing could help in covering more dimensions of a smart contract in comparison to manual testing. On top of it, automated testing tools also offer the flexibility of configuration with test data, thereby enabling easier comparison between actual results and predicted behaviors.
Why Do You Need to Test Smart Contracts?
One of the first questions about Ethereum smart contracts testing is the necessity of testing a smart contract. The first reason for testing smart contracts is that smart contracts are associated with applications involving high-value assets. For example, DeFi projects and non-fungible tokens use smart contracts. Even the slightest vulnerability in smart contracts could result in a humongous and irreversible loss for users. Comprehensive testing mechanisms could ensure better exposure to errors in smart contract logic, alongside reducing security risks prior to deployment.
The next important reason to focus on smart contract testing is the immutable nature of smart contracts. Once you have deployed smart contracts on the Ethereum Virtual Machine, there is no room for making any changes. Ethereum development does not offer the scope for updating smart contract logic to address security flaws after it is on the blockchain.
Proxy patterns can serve as an effective mechanism for upgrading smart contracts, albeit at the cost of difficulty in implementation. Apart from reducing immutability, updates would also require the involvement of complex governance processes. Therefore, comprehensive testing of flaws in smart contracts before deployment could reduce the necessity for code modifications.
What Are the Methods for Automated Testing of Smart Contracts?
The two most common types of approaches for testing Ethereum smart contracts with automated tools include functional testing and static/dynamic analysis. Let us take a look at the methods involved in these two automated testing approaches.
Functional testing is one of the common methods for automated testing of a smart contract. It focuses on the verification of smart contract functionality alongside providing assurance that each function could work as desired. Functional testing also demands a comprehensive understanding of the behavior of smart contracts in specific conditions. You could test every function through computations that use selected values and compare the output obtained with the desired output. Functional testing could facilitate coverage for three testing methods, such as unit testing, system testing and integration testing. Here is an overview of the different types of functional testing.
The first answer for “How do you test smart contract Ethereum?” with functional testing points at unit testing. The unit testing method works with the evaluation of individual components of a smart contract. It is important to note that a unit test offers simplicity, ease of operations and better idea regarding errors. Unit tests are a vital aspect of smart contract development, particularly for the addition of new logic in the smart contract code.
Unit testing could help you in the verification of the behavior of each function and ensure intended execution. Smart contracts developers can run unit tests by creating simple and informal statements known as assertions. The assertions would specify desired requirements for smart contracts, and unit tests would verify whether the smart contract fulfills the desired requirements.
The next approach in functional tests includes integration testing. The method involves testing smart contracts by reviewing all components of the smart contract together. Integration testing is an effective approach for detecting errors that emerge from interactions among different elements of a contract or between multiple contracts.
Integration tests are recommended for testing Ethereum smart contracts when you have a complex design featuring multiple functionalities. Developers can also use integration testing for identifying the functions in contracts that communicate with other contracts. It is also important to note that integration testing could ensure proper functionality of different aspects, such as dependency injection and inheritance.
Another proven method for automated functional smart contract testing is system testing. It is the final phase in functional testing and involves the evaluation of smart contracts as a completely integrated product. The primary objective of system testing focuses on the assessment of the end-to-end flow of smart contracts from a user’s perspective.
One of the effective approaches for system testing on the smart contract is to deploy in production-like staging environments such as testes or development networks. Some of the popular testnets for Ethereum smart contracts testing include Rinkeby and Ropsten. The testnets or development offers to offer flexibility for end-users to perform trial runs and report issues pertaining to the business logic of contracts. At the same time, they help in reviewing the overall functionality of the smart contract.
Want to know the real-world examples of smart contracts and understand how you can use it for your business? Check the presentation Now on Examples Of Smart Contracts
The list of automated methods for testing smart contracts also includes static and dynamic analysis. Static/dynamic analysis are essential highlights in answering “How do you test a smart contract Ethereum?” as they can evaluate the security status of smart contracts. Each technique leverages different methods for identifying security vulnerabilities in the contract logic.
Static analysis involves the examination of the source code of a smart contract before execution. The use of static analyzers can help developers identify common Ethereum smart contract vulnerabilities. In addition, developers could also ensure compliance with the best practices for smart contract development.
Dynamic analysis is a more comprehensive process in automated smart contract testing as it focuses on the execution of the smart contract in runtime environments. Dynamic code analyzers could help in monitoring contract behaviors over the course of the execution process. Subsequently, it can offer a comprehensive report about property violations and selected vulnerabilities. One of the most popular examples of dynamic analysis techniques is fuzzing or fuzz testing. Fuzz testing involves feeding invalid data to the smart contract and monitoring the response of the contract. Smart contracts depend on inputs offered by users for executing the desired functions. However, users may not enter the correct inputs in all cases. Incorrect input values for smart contracts could result in resource leaks, unintended code execution and crashes. Fuzzing could help in the proactive identification of issues that help in reducing vulnerability.
What Are the Methods for Manual Smart Contract Testing?
The manual methods for testing smart contracts such as code audits and bug bounties are also integral parts of smart contract development. You can find different functionalities and value advantages with the manual approaches for testing a smart contract. Developers can use manual testing as a complementary tool with automated testing for identifying errors missed by automated tools. How are manual testing methods useful for testing your Ethereum smart contract? The overview of popular manual testing methods for smart contracts could provide you with a reliable answer.
The code audit is a staple method for manual testing of the source code of smart contracts. It helps in identifying potential points of failure, inadequate development practices and security flaws. Human-aided code analysis from the perspective of a hacker could help in identifying all the possible ways in which one count attack a smart contract. Automated testing with code audit should involve analysis of every line of the source code for developing secure smart contracts. Developers can use security audits for testing Ethereum smart contracts and offering higher assurance of safety in smart contracts. Audits could offer the advantages of extensive analysis with the help of cybersecurity professionals and effective detection of bugs and vulnerabilities.
The next popular method for manual testing of a smart contract refers to bug bounty programs. Bug bounties are financial rewards offered to individuals capable of discovering vulnerabilities of bugs in smart contract logic. If you look closely, bug bounties are similar to code audits where developers ask the help of others for finding vulnerabilities in their smart contracts. The striking advantage of bug bounties in Ethereum smart contracts testing is the involvement of a broader developer community. In addition, bug bounties could also invite ethical hackers as well as independent security professionals for testing smart contract codes. As a result, you can capitalize on the advantages of a broad range of expertise for testing a smart contract.
Want to become A Etherum Developer? Enroll now in our Ethereum Development Fundamentals Course!
What is Formal Verification in Smart Contract Testing?
The necessity of formal verification is also an important component of the process of testing a smart contract. Testing could help you check whether the smart contract delivers desired results for a specific set of inputs. However, testing does not verify desired behavior of smart contract code for all input values and conditions. Therefore, formal verification is an essential approach for evaluating whether their smart contract logic is correct.
The answers to “How do you test a smart contract Ethereum?” draw attention to formal methods used in formal verification. Formal methods are mathematically complex techniques used for the verification of software and creation specifications. Formal verification is a vital tool for smart contracts as it can support the formal testing of assumptions related to smart contracts. Developers can create formal specifications, which include the definition of smart contract traits. Subsequently, formal verification involves checking whether the formal smart contract model matches the desired specifications. Formal verification is essential for increasing trust in the functionality of a smart contract. Smart contact developers can find assurance that the smart contract would execute the defined functions according to the business logic.
The future of blockchain depends on smart contracts. You can notice multiple vital applications of smart contracts in high-value applications such as NFTs and DeFi protocols. In addition, smart contracts would also pave the road for the expansion of web3 projects. Therefore, smart contract testing is an imperative requirement for every blockchain and web3 developer. As a developer, you can seek automated and manual testing methods for verifying the correctness of smart contract logic.
The automated testing methods such as unit tests, integration tests and system tests alongside static/dynamic analysis offer efficient discovery of errors in smart contract code. On the other hand, manual testing methods such as code audits and bug bounties offer an in-depth evaluation of smart contract logic. Learn more about smart contract development and Ethereum technology with reliable training resources.
*Disclaimer: The article should not be taken as, and is not intended to provide any investment advice. Claims made in this article do not constitute investment advice and should not be taken as such. 101 Blockchains shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this article. Do your own research!